RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
TradeDay vs Funded Futures Network
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
TDDY
TradeDay
EST. 2022
FFNT
Funded Futures Network
EST. 2022
TRADEDAY
METRIC
FUNDED FUTURES NETWORK
74/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
—0/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
80%TIE
PROFIT SPLIT
TIE80%
$150,000—
MAX FUNDING
BETTER$250,000
$99—
MIN COST
BETTER$81
14d—
PAYOUT DAYS
BETTER0d
—
PASS RATE
—
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0
TRADEDAY DETAILS
- STEPS
- 1-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Fixed
- MARKETS
- Futures
- PLATFORMS
- NinjaTrader, Tradovate, Rithmic
- TYPES
- futures
FUNDED FUTURES NETWORK DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Trailing EOD
- MARKETS
- Futures
- PLATFORMS
- Rithmic, Onyx, Quantower
TradeDay PROS
- +Min challenge cost of $99 is below the industry average of $186.7
- +Single-step funding process is faster than the industry average of 1.6 steps
- +Profit target of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, making evaluation easier to pass
- +News trading and EA/automated trading are both permitted
TradeDay CONS
- −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%
- −Days to first payout of 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days
- −Max funding of $150,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7
Funded Futures Network PROS
- +Min challenge cost of $81 is well below the industry average of $186.7, significantly reducing entry costs.
- +Days to first payout of 0 means instant payouts, far better than the industry average of 6.5 days.
- +On-demand payout frequency gives traders maximum flexibility in accessing their profits.
- +Profit target of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, making the challenge easier to complete.
Funded Futures Network CONS
- −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%, reducing the trader's share of earnings.
- −Max funding of $250,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting scale.
- −Two-step funding process is above the industry average of 1.6 steps, adding an extra evaluation hurdle.
PROPDNA VERDICT
Funded Futures Network
Lower trust score (0/100). Faster payouts at 0d. 80% profit split.
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy