TradeDay vs AquaFutures

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

TRADEDAY DETAILS

+Min challenge cost of $99 is below the industry average of $186.7
+Single-step funding process is faster than the industry average of 1.6 steps
+Profit target of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, making evaluation easier to pass
+News trading and EA/automated trading are both permitted

−Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%
−Days to first payout of 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days
−Max funding of $150,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7

+Listed as a futures firm, which offers an asset class not available at all prop firms.
+Firm name suggests an association with the Aqua brand, which may indicate shared infrastructure or credibility.
+Futures trading can provide access to high-liquidity instruments with defined contract specifications.
+The futures category is a growing segment within prop trading, reflecting market demand.

−No data has been provided for this firm, making any objective assessment impossible.
−Without metrics such as profit split, drawdown, funding levels, or challenge cost, no comparisons can be made.
−Traders should seek full disclosure of terms before considering this firm, as critical information is absent.

TradeDay

Not yet rated by PropDNA traders. Faster payouts at 1d. 80% profit split.

AquaFutures

Not yet rated by PropDNA traders. Slower payouts at 5d. 90% profit split.