RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Trading Cult vs Savius

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

TCLT

Trading Cult

EST. 2024

SVUS

Savius

EST. 2013

TRADING CULT

METRIC

SAVIUS

53/100BETTER

TRUST SCORE

—0/100

5/5BETTER

RATING

—0/5

80%—

PROFIT SPLIT

BETTER90%

$2,000,000BETTER

MAX FUNDING

—$300,000

$30BETTER

MIN COST

—$285

14d—

PAYOUT DAYS

BETTER3d

—

PASS RATE

—

1BETTER

REVIEW COUNT

—0

TRADING CULT DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals, Crypto
PLATFORMS: MT4, MT5, cTrader
TYPES: Fast Payout, Instant Funding

SAVIUS DETAILS

STEPS: 1-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Futures, Indices
PLATFORMS: ATAS, Quantower

Trading Cult PROS

+Min challenge cost of $30 is significantly below the industry average of $186.7, lowering the barrier to entry.
+Max funding of $2,000,000 is more than double the industry average of $839,272.7.
+Fixed drawdown type provides traders with predictable and stable risk boundaries.
+Profit target of 8% aligns with the industry average of 7.9%, setting a fair challenge threshold.

Trading Cult CONS

−News trading and EA/automated trading are both not allowed, severely restricting trading strategies.
−Weekend holding is not allowed, limiting flexibility for traders with longer-term positions.
−Days to first payout of 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days, delaying trader income.

Savius PROS

+Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.7% by 5.3 percentage points
+Days to first payout is 3, significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days
+Steps to funded is 1, well below the industry average of 1.6, simplifying the path to capital
+Founded in 2013, making it one of the more established prop firms with over a decade of operation

Savius CONS

−Max funding of $300,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272, limiting earning potential
−Min challenge cost of $285 is significantly higher than the industry average of $186.70
−Overall drawdown of 4% is considerably tighter than the industry average of 7.9%, increasing risk of disqualification

PROPDNA VERDICT

Trading Cult

Higher trust score (53/100). Slower payouts at 14d. 80% profit split.

START WITH TCLT