RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Trading Cult vs QT Funded

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

TCLT

Trading Cult

EST. 2024

QT Funded

EST. 2023

TRADING CULT

METRIC

QT FUNDED

53/100—

TRUST SCORE

BETTER72/100

5/5BETTER

RATING

—0/5

80%TIE

PROFIT SPLIT

TIE80%

$2,000,000BETTER

MAX FUNDING

—$400,000

$30—

MIN COST

BETTER$12

14d—

PAYOUT DAYS

BETTER1d

—

PASS RATE

—

1BETTER

REVIEW COUNT

—0

TRADING CULT DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals, Crypto
PLATFORMS: MT4, MT5, cTrader
TYPES: Fast Payout, Instant Funding

QT FUNDED DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Forex, Metals, Indices, Commodities, Crypto
PLATFORMS: MT5, cTrader, TradeLocker

Trading Cult PROS

+Min challenge cost of $30 is significantly below the industry average of $186.7, lowering the barrier to entry.
+Max funding of $2,000,000 is more than double the industry average of $839,272.7.
+Fixed drawdown type provides traders with predictable and stable risk boundaries.
+Profit target of 8% aligns with the industry average of 7.9%, setting a fair challenge threshold.

Trading Cult CONS

−News trading and EA/automated trading are both not allowed, severely restricting trading strategies.
−Weekend holding is not allowed, limiting flexibility for traders with longer-term positions.
−Days to first payout of 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days, delaying trader income.

QT Funded PROS

+Minimum challenge cost of $12 is drastically below the industry average of $186.7.
+Days to first payout of 1 day is far faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
+Fee refund is available, reducing the financial risk of the challenge.
+Profit target of 7% is below the industry average of 8%, making the target easier to hit.

QT Funded CONS

−Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%.
−Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, indicating higher risk tolerance required.
−News trading is not allowed, restricting a commonly used trading strategy.

PROPDNA VERDICT

Trading Cult

Lower trust score (53/100). Slower payouts at 14d. 80% profit split.

START WITH TCLT