RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Trading Cult vs Lionheart Funding

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

Trading Cult
TCLT
Trading Cult
EST. 2024
LHFT
Lionheart Funding
TRADING CULT
METRIC
LIONHEART FUNDING
53/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
0/100
5/5BETTER
RATING
0/5
80%
PROFIT SPLIT
$2,000,000
MAX FUNDING
$30
MIN COST
14d
PAYOUT DAYS
PASS RATE
1BETTER
REVIEW COUNT
0

TRADING CULT DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals, Crypto
PLATFORMS
MT4, MT5, cTrader
TYPES
Fast Payout, Instant Funding

LIONHEART FUNDING DETAILS

STEPS
-phase

Trading Cult PROS

  • +Min challenge cost of $30 is significantly below the industry average of $186.7, lowering the barrier to entry.
  • +Max funding of $2,000,000 is more than double the industry average of $839,272.7.
  • +Fixed drawdown type provides traders with predictable and stable risk boundaries.
  • +Profit target of 8% aligns with the industry average of 7.9%, setting a fair challenge threshold.

Trading Cult CONS

  • News trading and EA/automated trading are both not allowed, severely restricting trading strategies.
  • Weekend holding is not allowed, limiting flexibility for traders with longer-term positions.
  • Days to first payout of 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days, delaying trader income.

Lionheart Funding PROS

  • +No data is available to identify any above-average metrics for Lionheart Funding.
  • +No data is available to identify any above-average metrics for Lionheart Funding.
  • +No data is available to identify any above-average metrics for Lionheart Funding.
  • +No data is available to identify any above-average metrics for Lionheart Funding.

Lionheart Funding CONS

  • Almost no firm data is provided, making meaningful comparison to industry averages impossible.
  • Without cost, payout, or funding data, traders cannot assess value against the $186.7 average challenge cost.
  • Lack of transparency on key metrics is a significant concern for traders making real financial decisions.

PROPDNA VERDICT

Trading Cult
Higher trust score (53/100). Faster payouts at 14d. 80% profit split.
Lionheart Funding
Lower trust score (0/100). Slower payouts at —d.

RELATED LINKS

Trading Cult Full Review →Lionheart Funding Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy