RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
Trading Cult vs FundedFast
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
TCLT
Trading Cult
EST. 2024
FNDF
FundedFast
TRADING CULT
METRIC
FUNDEDFAST
53/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
—0/100
5/5BETTER
RATING
—0/5
80%TIE
PROFIT SPLIT
TIE80%
$2,000,000BETTER
MAX FUNDING
—$400,000
$30BETTER
MIN COST
—$49
14d—
PAYOUT DAYS
BETTER7d
—
PASS RATE
—
1BETTER
REVIEW COUNT
—0
TRADING CULT DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Fixed
- MARKETS
- Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals, Crypto
- PLATFORMS
- MT4, MT5, cTrader
- TYPES
- Fast Payout, Instant Funding
FUNDEDFAST DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Fixed
- MARKETS
- Forex
Trading Cult PROS
- +Min challenge cost of $30 is significantly below the industry average of $186.7, lowering the barrier to entry.
- +Max funding of $2,000,000 is more than double the industry average of $839,272.7.
- +Fixed drawdown type provides traders with predictable and stable risk boundaries.
- +Profit target of 8% aligns with the industry average of 7.9%, setting a fair challenge threshold.
Trading Cult CONS
- −News trading and EA/automated trading are both not allowed, severely restricting trading strategies.
- −Weekend holding is not allowed, limiting flexibility for traders with longer-term positions.
- −Days to first payout of 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days, delaying trader income.
FundedFast PROS
- +Min challenge cost of $49 is extremely low compared to the industry average of $186.7
- +Fee refund offered, reducing the net cost of the evaluation process
- +Weekend holding is allowed, providing greater trading flexibility
- +Weekly payout frequency offers faster access to profits than many firms
FundedFast CONS
- −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%
- −Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, indicating less buffer
- −Profit target of 8% is slightly above the industry average of 7.9%, marginally harder to achieve
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy