RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Trading Cult vs Funded Futures Network

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

TCLT

Trading Cult

EST. 2024

FFNT

Funded Futures Network

EST. 2022

TRADING CULT

METRIC

FUNDED FUTURES NETWORK

53/100BETTER

TRUST SCORE

—0/100

5/5BETTER

RATING

—0/5

80%TIE

PROFIT SPLIT

TIE80%

$2,000,000BETTER

MAX FUNDING

—$250,000

$30BETTER

MIN COST

—$81

14d—

PAYOUT DAYS

BETTER0d

—

PASS RATE

—

1BETTER

REVIEW COUNT

—0

TRADING CULT DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals, Crypto
PLATFORMS: MT4, MT5, cTrader
TYPES: Fast Payout, Instant Funding

FUNDED FUTURES NETWORK DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
DRAWDOWN: Trailing EOD
MARKETS: Futures
PLATFORMS: Rithmic, Onyx, Quantower

Trading Cult PROS

+Min challenge cost of $30 is significantly below the industry average of $186.7, lowering the barrier to entry.
+Max funding of $2,000,000 is more than double the industry average of $839,272.7.
+Fixed drawdown type provides traders with predictable and stable risk boundaries.
+Profit target of 8% aligns with the industry average of 7.9%, setting a fair challenge threshold.

Trading Cult CONS

−News trading and EA/automated trading are both not allowed, severely restricting trading strategies.
−Weekend holding is not allowed, limiting flexibility for traders with longer-term positions.
−Days to first payout of 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days, delaying trader income.

Funded Futures Network PROS

+Min challenge cost of $81 is well below the industry average of $186.7, significantly reducing entry costs.
+Days to first payout of 0 means instant payouts, far better than the industry average of 6.5 days.
+On-demand payout frequency gives traders maximum flexibility in accessing their profits.
+Profit target of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, making the challenge easier to complete.

Funded Futures Network CONS

−Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%, reducing the trader's share of earnings.
−Max funding of $250,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting scale.
−Two-step funding process is above the industry average of 1.6 steps, adding an extra evaluation hurdle.

PROPDNA VERDICT

Trading Cult

Higher trust score (53/100). Slower payouts at 14d. 80% profit split.

START WITH TCLT