RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Trading Cult vs Aqua Funded

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

Trading Cult
TCLT
Trading Cult
EST. 2024
Aqua Funded
AQUA
Aqua Funded
EST. 2023
TRADING CULT
METRIC
AQUA FUNDED
58/100
TRUST SCORE
BETTER59/100
4.73/5BETTER
RATING
4/5
80%
PROFIT SPLIT
BETTER90%
$2,000,000TIE
MAX FUNDING
TIE$2,000,000
$30
MIN COST
BETTER$1
14d
PAYOUT DAYS
BETTER7d
PASS RATE
3BETTER
REVIEW COUNT
2

TRADING CULT DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals, Crypto
PLATFORMS
MT4, MT5, cTrader
TYPES
Fast Payout, Instant Funding

AQUA FUNDED DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Trailing
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Metals, Commodities, Crypto
PLATFORMS
MT5, cTrader, Match-Trader, TradeLocker

Trading Cult PROS

  • +Min challenge cost of $30 is significantly below the industry average of $186.7, lowering the barrier to entry.
  • +Max funding of $2,000,000 is more than double the industry average of $839,272.7.
  • +Fixed drawdown type provides traders with predictable and stable risk boundaries.
  • +Profit target of 8% aligns with the industry average of 7.9%, setting a fair challenge threshold.

Trading Cult CONS

  • News trading and EA/automated trading are both not allowed, severely restricting trading strategies.
  • Weekend holding is not allowed, limiting flexibility for traders with longer-term positions.
  • Days to first payout of 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days, delaying trader income.

Aqua Funded PROS

  • +Min challenge cost of just $1 is exceptionally below the industry average of $186.7, making it highly accessible.
  • +Max funding of $2,000,000 is more than double the industry average of $839,272.7.
  • +Profit split of 90% significantly exceeds the industry average of 84.7%.
  • +Weekend holding, news trading, and EA use are all permitted, offering maximum trading flexibility.

Aqua Funded CONS

  • Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, requiring traders to manage larger potential losses.
  • Profit target of 10% is higher than the industry average of 7.9%, making the challenge harder to pass.
  • Days to first payout of 7 is slightly above the industry average of 6.5 days.

PROPDNA VERDICT

Trading Cult
Lower trust score (58/100). Slower payouts at 14d. 80% profit split.
Aqua Funded
Higher trust score (59/100). Faster payouts at 7d. 90% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

Trading Cult Full Review →Aqua Funded Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy