RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Savius vs V Prop Trader

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

SVUS

Savius

EST. 2013

VPRT

V Prop Trader

SAVIUS

METRIC

V PROP TRADER

0/100TIE

TRUST SCORE

TIE0/100

0/5TIE

RATING

TIE0/5

90%—

PROFIT SPLIT

BETTER95%

$300,000

MAX FUNDING

—

$285

MIN COST

—

3d—

PAYOUT DAYS

BETTER0d

—

PASS RATE

—

0TIE

REVIEW COUNT

TIE0

SAVIUS DETAILS

STEPS: 1-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Futures, Indices
PLATFORMS: ATAS, Quantower

V PROP TRADER DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
MARKETS: Forex, Crypto
PLATFORMS: MT5, VTrader

Savius PROS

+Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.7% by 5.3 percentage points
+Days to first payout is 3, significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days
+Steps to funded is 1, well below the industry average of 1.6, simplifying the path to capital
+Founded in 2013, making it one of the more established prop firms with over a decade of operation

Savius CONS

−Max funding of $300,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272, limiting earning potential
−Min challenge cost of $285 is significantly higher than the industry average of $186.70
−Overall drawdown of 4% is considerably tighter than the industry average of 7.9%, increasing risk of disqualification

V Prop Trader PROS

+Profit split of 95% is significantly above the industry average of 84.7%, maximising trader earnings.
+Days to first payout of 0 means traders can access profits immediately, well below the industry average of 6.5 days.
+Offers MT5 alongside the proprietary VTrader platform, providing at least one widely recognised trading environment.
+Covers both Forex and Crypto markets, giving traders access to high-liquidity and high-volatility asset classes.

V Prop Trader CONS

−No max funding, challenge cost, or drawdown data is provided for comparison against industry averages.
−Two steps to funded is above the industry average of 1.6, requiring additional evaluation stages.
−Limited market coverage of only two asset classes may restrict diversification compared to broader offerings.

PROPDNA VERDICT

Savius

Higher trust score (0/100). Slower payouts at 3d. 90% profit split.

START WITH SVUS