RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Savius vs Tradeify

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

SVUS

Savius

EST. 2013

TRFY

Tradeify

EST. 2022

SAVIUS

METRIC

TRADEIFY

60/100—

TRUST SCORE

BETTER61/100

4/5BETTER

RATING

—3.75/5

90%TIE

PROFIT SPLIT

TIE90%

$300,000BETTER

MAX FUNDING

—$150,000

$285—

MIN COST

BETTER$99

3dBETTER

PAYOUT DAYS

—7d

—

PASS RATE

—

1—

REVIEW COUNT

BETTER3

SAVIUS DETAILS

STEPS: 1-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Futures, Indices
PLATFORMS: ATAS, Quantower

TRADEIFY DETAILS

STEPS: 1-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Futures
PLATFORMS: NinjaTrader, Quantower, Rithmic, TradingView, Tradovate, WealthCharts
TYPES: futures, fast-payout

Savius PROS

+Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.7% by 5.3 percentage points
+Days to first payout is 3, significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days
+Steps to funded is 1, well below the industry average of 1.6, simplifying the path to capital
+Founded in 2013, making it one of the more established prop firms with over a decade of operation

Savius CONS

−Max funding of $300,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272, limiting earning potential
−Min challenge cost of $285 is significantly higher than the industry average of $186.70
−Overall drawdown of 4% is considerably tighter than the industry average of 7.9%, increasing risk of disqualification

Tradeify PROS

+Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.7%, offering traders a larger earnings share
+Min challenge cost of $99 is well below the industry average of $186.7, lowering entry barriers
+Single-step funding process beats the industry average of 1.6 steps, offering faster access to capital
+On-demand payouts provide maximum flexibility compared to fixed payout schedule firms

Tradeify CONS

−Max funding of $150,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7
−Overall drawdown of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, leaving less room for drawdown
−Weekend holding is not allowed, restricting trading flexibility for position traders

PROPDNA VERDICT

Savius

Lower trust score (60/100). Faster payouts at 3d. 90% profit split.

START WITH SVUS