RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Savius vs Optimal Traders

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

SVUS

Savius

EST. 2013

OPTM

Optimal Traders

SAVIUS

METRIC

OPTIMAL TRADERS

60/100BETTER

TRUST SCORE

—49/100

4/5—

RATING

BETTER4.33/5

90%

PROFIT SPLIT

—

$300,000

MAX FUNDING

—

$285

MIN COST

—

PAYOUT DAYS

—

PASS RATE

—

1—

REVIEW COUNT

BETTER4

SAVIUS DETAILS

STEPS: 1-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Futures, Indices
PLATFORMS: ATAS, Quantower

OPTIMAL TRADERS DETAILS

STEPS: -phase

Savius PROS

+Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.7% by 5.3 percentage points
+Days to first payout is 3, significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days
+Steps to funded is 1, well below the industry average of 1.6, simplifying the path to capital
+Founded in 2013, making it one of the more established prop firms with over a decade of operation

Savius CONS

−Max funding of $300,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272, limiting earning potential
−Min challenge cost of $285 is significantly higher than the industry average of $186.70
−Overall drawdown of 4% is considerably tighter than the industry average of 7.9%, increasing risk of disqualification

Optimal Traders PROS

+The firm name implies an optimisation-focused approach to trader evaluation and development.
+Inclusion on a comparison platform indicates some degree of public presence and accountability.
+A structured funding model, if present, could support disciplined and performance-driven traders.
+Potential for competitive terms cannot be ruled out without further data disclosure.

Optimal Traders CONS

−No data whatsoever has been provided for this firm, making any objective evaluation impossible.
−Without profit split, drawdown, funding levels, or challenge cost, no industry comparisons can be made.
−Traders cannot make any informed decisions without full disclosure of this firm's core terms and conditions.

PROPDNA VERDICT

Savius

Higher trust score (60/100). Faster payouts at 3d. 90% profit split.

START WITH SVUS