RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Savius vs Nino Options

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

SVUS
Savius
EST. 2013
NINO
Nino Options
SAVIUS
METRIC
NINO OPTIONS
60/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
—48/100
4/5—
RATING
BETTER5/5
90%
PROFIT SPLIT
—
$300,000
MAX FUNDING
—
$285
MIN COST
—
3d
PAYOUT DAYS
—
—
PASS RATE
—
1—
REVIEW COUNT
BETTER2

SAVIUS DETAILS

STEPS
1-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Futures, Indices
PLATFORMS
ATAS, Quantower

NINO OPTIONS DETAILS

STEPS
-phase

Savius PROS

  • +Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.7% by 5.3 percentage points
  • +Days to first payout is 3, significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days
  • +Steps to funded is 1, well below the industry average of 1.6, simplifying the path to capital
  • +Founded in 2013, making it one of the more established prop firms with over a decade of operation

Savius CONS

  • −Max funding of $300,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272, limiting earning potential
  • −Min challenge cost of $285 is significantly higher than the industry average of $186.70
  • −Overall drawdown of 4% is considerably tighter than the industry average of 7.9%, increasing risk of disqualification

Nino Options PROS

  • +No data is available on profit split, funding, or cost metrics for this firm
  • +No data is available on drawdown or profit target for this firm
  • +No data is available on payout timing or steps to funded for this firm
  • +No data is available on platforms, markets, or founding date for this firm

Nino Options CONS

  • −Virtually no data is provided, making any objective evaluation impossible
  • −Traders cannot compare this firm's terms to the industry average of 84.7% profit split
  • −Lack of transparency on key metrics is a significant risk for traders making financial decisions

PROPDNA VERDICT

Savius
Higher trust score (60/100). Faster payouts at 3d. 90% profit split.
Nino Options
Lower trust score (48/100). Slower payouts at —d.

RELATED LINKS

Savius Full Review →Nino Options Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy