RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Savius vs ICFunded

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

SVUS
Savius
EST. 2013
ICFD
ICFunded
SAVIUS
METRIC
ICFUNDED
60/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
56/100
4/5
RATING
BETTER4.4/5
90%BETTER
PROFIT SPLIT
80%
$300,000
MAX FUNDING
BETTER$500,000
$285
MIN COST
BETTER$74
3dBETTER
PAYOUT DAYS
14d
PASS RATE
1
REVIEW COUNT
BETTER2

SAVIUS DETAILS

STEPS
1-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Futures, Indices
PLATFORMS
ATAS, Quantower

ICFUNDED DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
static
MARKETS
forex, indices, metals, commodities, crypto
PLATFORMS
mt5
TYPES
forex, futures

Savius PROS

  • +Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.7% by 5.3 percentage points
  • +Days to first payout is 3, significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days
  • +Steps to funded is 1, well below the industry average of 1.6, simplifying the path to capital
  • +Founded in 2013, making it one of the more established prop firms with over a decade of operation

Savius CONS

  • Max funding of $300,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272, limiting earning potential
  • Min challenge cost of $285 is significantly higher than the industry average of $186.70
  • Overall drawdown of 4% is considerably tighter than the industry average of 7.9%, increasing risk of disqualification

ICFunded PROS

  • +Min challenge cost of $74 is well below the industry average of $186.7, lowering entry costs.
  • +Profit split of 80% is provided with bi-weekly payouts, offering regular income access.
  • +Static drawdown type provides clear, fixed risk boundaries for traders to plan around.
  • +Markets include forex, indices, metals, commodities, and crypto, offering reasonable diversification.

ICFunded CONS

  • Max funding of $500,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting upside potential.
  • Key data including days to first payout, profit target, drawdown percentage, and trading condition rules are not provided, limiting transparency.
  • Only MT5 is listed as a platform, offering less choice than most competitors with multiple platform options.

PROPDNA VERDICT

Savius
Higher trust score (60/100). Faster payouts at 3d. 90% profit split.
ICFunded
Lower trust score (56/100). Slower payouts at 14d. 80% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

Savius Full Review →ICFunded Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy