RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Savius vs Goat Funded

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

SVUS

Savius

EST. 2013

GOAT

Goat Funded

EST. 2023

SAVIUS

METRIC

GOAT FUNDED

60/100—

TRUST SCORE

BETTER62/100

4/5BETTER

RATING

—3.43/5

90%BETTER

PROFIT SPLIT

—80%

$300,000—

MAX FUNDING

BETTER$400,000

$285—

MIN COST

BETTER$49

3d—

PAYOUT DAYS

BETTER2d

—

PASS RATE

—

1—

REVIEW COUNT

BETTER3

SAVIUS DETAILS

STEPS: 1-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Futures, Indices
PLATFORMS: ATAS, Quantower

GOAT FUNDED DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals, Crypto
PLATFORMS: TradeLocker, MT5

Savius PROS

+Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.7% by 5.3 percentage points
+Days to first payout is 3, significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days
+Steps to funded is 1, well below the industry average of 1.6, simplifying the path to capital
+Founded in 2013, making it one of the more established prop firms with over a decade of operation

Savius CONS

−Max funding of $300,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272, limiting earning potential
−Min challenge cost of $285 is significantly higher than the industry average of $186.70
−Overall drawdown of 4% is considerably tighter than the industry average of 7.9%, increasing risk of disqualification

Goat Funded PROS

+Minimum challenge cost of $49 is well below the industry average of $186.7.
+Days to first payout of 2 is significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
+Fee refund is offered, reducing financial risk for traders who pass the challenge.
+Weekend holding, news trading, and EA use are all permitted.

Goat Funded CONS

−Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%.
−Max funding of $400,000 is below the industry average of $839,272.7.
−Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, though it also provides more buffer.

PROPDNA VERDICT

Savius

Lower trust score (60/100). Slower payouts at 3d. 90% profit split.

START WITH SVUS