RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Savius vs FuturesElite

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

SVUS

Savius

EST. 2013

FTEL

FuturesElite

SAVIUS

METRIC

FUTURESELITE

60/100BETTER

TRUST SCORE

—59/100

4/5TIE

RATING

TIE4/5

90%—

PROFIT SPLIT

BETTER100%

$300,000BETTER

MAX FUNDING

—$150,000

$285—

MIN COST

BETTER$79

3d—

PAYOUT DAYS

BETTER1d

—

PASS RATE

—

1TIE

REVIEW COUNT

TIE1

SAVIUS DETAILS

STEPS: 1-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Futures, Indices
PLATFORMS: ATAS, Quantower

FUTURESELITE DETAILS

STEPS: 1-phase
DRAWDOWN: Trailing
MARKETS: Futures
PLATFORMS: Tradovate, NinjaTrader, Quantower, Atas

Savius PROS

+Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.7% by 5.3 percentage points
+Days to first payout is 3, significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days
+Steps to funded is 1, well below the industry average of 1.6, simplifying the path to capital
+Founded in 2013, making it one of the more established prop firms with over a decade of operation

Savius CONS

−Max funding of $300,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272, limiting earning potential
−Min challenge cost of $285 is significantly higher than the industry average of $186.70
−Overall drawdown of 4% is considerably tighter than the industry average of 7.9%, increasing risk of disqualification

FuturesElite PROS

+Profit split of 100% is exceptional and far above the industry average of 84.7%, maximising trader earnings.
+Days to first payout of 1 is far faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
+Steps to funded is 1, well below the industry average of 1.6, enabling faster access to capital.
+Profit target of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, making the challenge easier to achieve.

FuturesElite CONS

−Max funding of $150,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting earning potential.
−Overall drawdown is dollar-denominated at $2,000 and cannot be meaningfully compared to the percentage-based industry average.
−No daily drawdown limit is listed, which may introduce uncertainty around intraday risk controls.

PROPDNA VERDICT

Savius

Higher trust score (60/100). Slower payouts at 3d. 90% profit split.

START WITH SVUS