RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
Savius vs Fidelcrest
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
SVUS
Savius
EST. 2013
FDLC
Fidelcrest
SAVIUS
METRIC
FIDELCREST
0/100TIE
TRUST SCORE
TIE0/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
90%
PROFIT SPLIT
—
$300,000
MAX FUNDING
—
$285
MIN COST
—
3d
PAYOUT DAYS
—
—
PASS RATE
—
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0
SAVIUS DETAILS
- STEPS
- 1-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Fixed
- MARKETS
- Futures, Indices
- PLATFORMS
- ATAS, Quantower
FIDELCREST DETAILS
- STEPS
- -phase
Savius PROS
- +Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.7% by 5.3 percentage points
- +Days to first payout is 3, significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days
- +Steps to funded is 1, well below the industry average of 1.6, simplifying the path to capital
- +Founded in 2013, making it one of the more established prop firms with over a decade of operation
Savius CONS
- −Max funding of $300,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272, limiting earning potential
- −Min challenge cost of $285 is significantly higher than the industry average of $186.70
- −Overall drawdown of 4% is considerably tighter than the industry average of 7.9%, increasing risk of disqualification
Fidelcrest PROS
- +Cyprus is an EU-regulated jurisdiction, offering traders a degree of regulatory oversight and protection
- +Placeholder pro — limited data prevents further above-average metric identification
- +Placeholder pro — limited data prevents further above-average metric identification
- +Placeholder pro — limited data prevents further above-average metric identification
Fidelcrest CONS
- −No profit split, funding cap, drawdown, or payout data is available for comparison
- −Absence of key metrics makes it impossible to evaluate this firm against industry averages
- −Limited data is itself a transparency concern for traders making financial decisions
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy