RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
Savius vs Earn2Trade
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
SVUS
Savius
EST. 2013
E2TR
Earn2Trade
EST. 2016
SAVIUS
METRIC
EARN2TRADE
60/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
—48/100
4/5BETTER
RATING
—0/5
90%BETTER
PROFIT SPLIT
—80%
$300,000BETTER
MAX FUNDING
—$200,000
$285—
MIN COST
BETTER$150
3dBETTER
PAYOUT DAYS
—14d
—
PASS RATE
9%
1BETTER
REVIEW COUNT
—0
SAVIUS DETAILS
- STEPS
- 1-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Fixed
- MARKETS
- Futures, Indices
- PLATFORMS
- ATAS, Quantower
EARN2TRADE DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Fixed
- MARKETS
- Futures
- PLATFORMS
- NinjaTrader, Tradovate, Sierra Chart
- TYPES
- futures, beginner
Savius PROS
- +Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.7% by 5.3 percentage points
- +Days to first payout is 3, significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days
- +Steps to funded is 1, well below the industry average of 1.6, simplifying the path to capital
- +Founded in 2013, making it one of the more established prop firms with over a decade of operation
Savius CONS
- −Max funding of $300,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272, limiting earning potential
- −Min challenge cost of $285 is significantly higher than the industry average of $186.70
- −Overall drawdown of 4% is considerably tighter than the industry average of 7.9%, increasing risk of disqualification
Earn2Trade PROS
- +Founded in 2016, making it one of the most established firms in the industry
- +Min challenge cost of $150 is below the industry average of $186.7
- +News trading and EA/automated trading are both permitted
- +Single profit target comparison: 10% is clearly disclosed, aiding trader planning
Earn2Trade CONS
- −Reported pass rate of 9% is extremely low, meaning very few traders successfully get funded
- −Days to first payout of 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days
- −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy