RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
Savius vs DPFunded
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
SVUS
Savius
EST. 2013
DPFD
DPFunded
SAVIUS
METRIC
DPFUNDED
60/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
—40/100
4/5BETTER
RATING
—0/5
90%BETTER
PROFIT SPLIT
—80%
$300,000—
MAX FUNDING
BETTER$400,000
$285—
MIN COST
BETTER$58
3d
PAYOUT DAYS
—
—
PASS RATE
—
1BETTER
REVIEW COUNT
—0
SAVIUS DETAILS
- STEPS
- 1-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Fixed
- MARKETS
- Futures, Indices
- PLATFORMS
- ATAS, Quantower
DPFUNDED DETAILS
- STEPS
- 1-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Fixed
- MARKETS
- Forex, Commodities, Indices
Savius PROS
- +Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.7% by 5.3 percentage points
- +Days to first payout is 3, significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days
- +Steps to funded is 1, well below the industry average of 1.6, simplifying the path to capital
- +Founded in 2013, making it one of the more established prop firms with over a decade of operation
Savius CONS
- −Max funding of $300,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272, limiting earning potential
- −Min challenge cost of $285 is significantly higher than the industry average of $186.70
- −Overall drawdown of 4% is considerably tighter than the industry average of 7.9%, increasing risk of disqualification
DPFunded PROS
- +Steps to funded is 1, well below the industry average of 1.6, offering a faster route to capital.
- +Min challenge cost of $58 is significantly below the industry average of $186.7, reducing upfront cost.
- +Fixed drawdown type provides traders with clear and predictable risk boundaries.
- +EA/automated trading is permitted, accommodating algorithmic and systematic trading strategies.
DPFunded CONS
- −Overall drawdown of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, giving traders less room to absorb losses.
- −Max funding of $400,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting earning potential.
- −News trading is not allowed and payout frequency is monthly, restricting strategy flexibility and delaying income.
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy