RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
Savius vs BestProp4U
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
SVUS
Savius
EST. 2013
BPFU
BestProp4U
EST. 2025
SAVIUS
METRIC
BESTPROP4U
0/100—
TRUST SCORE
BETTER48/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
90%BETTER
PROFIT SPLIT
—80%
$300,000—
MAX FUNDING
BETTER$1,000,000
$285—
MIN COST
BETTER$49
3d—
PAYOUT DAYS
BETTER2d
—
PASS RATE
—
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0
SAVIUS DETAILS
- STEPS
- 1-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Fixed
- MARKETS
- Futures, Indices
- PLATFORMS
- ATAS, Quantower
BESTPROP4U DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Trailing EOD
- MARKETS
- Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals, Crypto, Futures
- PLATFORMS
- MT5, Match-Trader, TradeLocker
Savius PROS
- +Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.7% by 5.3 percentage points
- +Days to first payout is 3, significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days
- +Steps to funded is 1, well below the industry average of 1.6, simplifying the path to capital
- +Founded in 2013, making it one of the more established prop firms with over a decade of operation
Savius CONS
- −Max funding of $300,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272, limiting earning potential
- −Min challenge cost of $285 is significantly higher than the industry average of $186.70
- −Overall drawdown of 4% is considerably tighter than the industry average of 7.9%, increasing risk of disqualification
BestProp4U PROS
- +Max funding of $1,000,000 exceeds the industry average of $839,272, offering above-average capital access
- +Min challenge cost of $49 is well below the industry average of $186.70, lowering entry barriers
- +Days to first payout is 2, significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days
- +Allows weekend holding, news trading, and EA/automated trading, supporting diverse trading strategies
BestProp4U CONS
- −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7% by 4.7 percentage points
- −Founded in 2025, making it a very new firm with a limited operational track record
- −Trailing EOD drawdown type can be less forgiving than fixed drawdown for active traders
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy