RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Savius vs Blue Guardian Capital

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

SVUS
Savius
EST. 2013
Blue Guardian Capital
BLGU
Blue Guardian Capital
EST. 2022
SAVIUS
METRIC
BLUE GUARDIAN CAPITAL
60/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
—59/100
4/5TIE
RATING
TIE4/5
90%BETTER
PROFIT SPLIT
—85%
$300,000BETTER
MAX FUNDING
—$200,000
$285—
MIN COST
BETTER$99
3dBETTER
PAYOUT DAYS
—7d
—
PASS RATE
—
1—
REVIEW COUNT
BETTER2

SAVIUS DETAILS

STEPS
1-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Futures, Indices
PLATFORMS
ATAS, Quantower

BLUE GUARDIAN CAPITAL DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals
PLATFORMS
MT4, MT5
TYPES
forex

Savius PROS

  • +Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.7% by 5.3 percentage points
  • +Days to first payout is 3, significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days
  • +Steps to funded is 1, well below the industry average of 1.6, simplifying the path to capital
  • +Founded in 2013, making it one of the more established prop firms with over a decade of operation

Savius CONS

  • −Max funding of $300,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272, limiting earning potential
  • −Min challenge cost of $285 is significantly higher than the industry average of $186.70
  • −Overall drawdown of 4% is considerably tighter than the industry average of 7.9%, increasing risk of disqualification

Blue Guardian Capital PROS

  • +Profit split of 85% is marginally above the industry average of 84.7%
  • +Min challenge cost of $99 is below the industry average of $186.7
  • +On-demand payouts offer faster access to profits than monthly or bi-weekly schedules
  • +Weekend holding, news trading, and EA use are all permitted

Blue Guardian Capital CONS

  • −Max funding of $200,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7
  • −Two steps to funded is slightly above the industry average of 1.6 steps
  • −No fee refund is offered, meaning challenge costs are non-recoverable

PROPDNA VERDICT

Savius
Higher trust score (60/100). Faster payouts at 3d. 90% profit split.
Blue Guardian Capital
Lower trust score (59/100). Slower payouts at 7d. 85% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

Savius Full Review →Blue Guardian Capital Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy