RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Savius vs Blue Guardian Futures

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

SVUS

Savius

EST. 2013

BGFT

Blue Guardian Futures

SAVIUS

METRIC

BLUE GUARDIAN FUTURES

0/100TIE

TRUST SCORE

TIE0/100

0/5TIE

RATING

TIE0/5

90%—

PROFIT SPLIT

BETTER100%

$300,000—

MAX FUNDING

BETTER$450,000

$285—

MIN COST

BETTER$84

3dBETTER

PAYOUT DAYS

—5d

—

PASS RATE

—

0TIE

REVIEW COUNT

TIE0

SAVIUS DETAILS

STEPS: 1-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Futures, Indices
PLATFORMS: ATAS, Quantower

BLUE GUARDIAN FUTURES DETAILS

STEPS: 1-phase
DRAWDOWN: Trailing EOD
MARKETS: Futures
PLATFORMS: MT5, Matchtrader, Tradelocker, Tradovate, ProjectX, Volsys, Deepcharts

Savius PROS

+Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.7% by 5.3 percentage points
+Days to first payout is 3, significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days
+Steps to funded is 1, well below the industry average of 1.6, simplifying the path to capital
+Founded in 2013, making it one of the more established prop firms with over a decade of operation

Savius CONS

−Max funding of $300,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272, limiting earning potential
−Min challenge cost of $285 is significantly higher than the industry average of $186.70
−Overall drawdown of 4% is considerably tighter than the industry average of 7.9%, increasing risk of disqualification

Blue Guardian Futures PROS

+Profit split of 100% is the maximum possible, far exceeding the industry average of 84.7%
+Min challenge cost of $84 is well below the industry average of $186.70, reducing entry costs
+Steps to funded is 1, well below the industry average of 1.6, offering a streamlined path to capital
+Days to first payout is 5, slightly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days

Blue Guardian Futures CONS

−Overall drawdown of 3.5% is expressed as a percentage but is exceptionally tight, increasing disqualification risk
−Max funding of $450,000 is below the industry average of $839,272, limiting maximum earning potential
−Futures-only market access restricts traders who prefer Forex, Indices, or other asset classes

PROPDNA VERDICT

Savius

Higher trust score (0/100). Faster payouts at 3d. 90% profit split.

START WITH SVUS