RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Savius vs OneFunded

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

SVUS
Savius
EST. 2013
OneFunded
1FND
OneFunded
✓ VERIFIEDEST. 2023
SAVIUS
METRIC
ONEFUNDED
0/100—
TRUST SCORE
BETTER55/100
0/5—
RATING
BETTER1/5
90%TIE
PROFIT SPLIT
TIE90%
$300,000BETTER
MAX FUNDING
—$200,000
$285—
MIN COST
BETTER$59
3dBETTER
PAYOUT DAYS
—14d
—
PASS RATE
35%
0—
REVIEW COUNT
BETTER1

SAVIUS DETAILS

STEPS
1-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Futures, Indices
PLATFORMS
ATAS, Quantower

ONEFUNDED DETAILS

STEPS
1-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Crypto, Metals, Stocks
PLATFORMS
MT5, cTrader
TYPES
forex, beginner, multi-asset, crypto

Savius PROS

  • +Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.7% by 5.3 percentage points
  • +Days to first payout is 3, significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days
  • +Steps to funded is 1, well below the industry average of 1.6, simplifying the path to capital
  • +Founded in 2013, making it one of the more established prop firms with over a decade of operation

Savius CONS

  • −Max funding of $300,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272, limiting earning potential
  • −Min challenge cost of $285 is significantly higher than the industry average of $186.70
  • −Overall drawdown of 4% is considerably tighter than the industry average of 7.9%, increasing risk of disqualification

OneFunded PROS

  • +No time limits on eval
  • +4 challenge tracks
  • +Transparent rules

OneFunded CONS

  • −Days to first payout is 14, more than double the industry average of 6.5 days
  • −Max funding of $200,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272
  • −Pass rate of 35% suggests moderate selectivity, though no drawdown or profit target data is provided for context

PROPDNA VERDICT

Savius
Lower trust score (0/100). Faster payouts at 3d. 90% profit split.
OneFunded
Higher trust score (55/100). Slower payouts at 14d. 90% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

Savius Full Review →OneFunded Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy