RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Simplex Trading vs Goat Funded Trader

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

SPLX

Simplex Trading

EST. 2004

GFTR

Goat Funded Trader

SIMPLEX TRADING

METRIC

GOAT FUNDED TRADER

0/100TIE

TRUST SCORE

TIE0/100

0/5TIE

RATING

TIE0/5

—

PROFIT SPLIT

—

MAX FUNDING

—

MIN COST

—

PAYOUT DAYS

—

PASS RATE

—

0TIE

REVIEW COUNT

TIE0

SIMPLEX TRADING DETAILS

STEPS: -phase

GOAT FUNDED TRADER DETAILS

STEPS: -phase
MARKETS: Forex, Futures

Simplex Trading PROS

+Founded in 2004, giving Simplex Trading over 20 years of operational history, suggesting longevity.
+US-based firm operating in a well-known financial jurisdiction.
+Long track record may indicate institutional-level stability compared to newer prop firms.
+No further data is available to substantiate additional pros at this time.

Simplex Trading CONS

−No key metrics such as profit split, drawdown, funding levels, or challenge cost are provided.
−Absence of platform and market data makes it impossible to assess trading conditions.
−Traders cannot compare Simplex Trading against industry averages without core financial data.

Goat Funded Trader PROS

+Covers both Forex and Futures markets, offering access to two distinct and liquid trading environments.
+No further data is available to substantiate additional pros at this time.
+No funding or cost data is available to compare against industry benchmarks.
+No profit split or payout data exists to evaluate trader compensation.

Goat Funded Trader CONS

−Almost no operational data is available for Goat Funded Trader beyond market types.
−Note: as a futures firm, drawdown may be expressed in dollar terms and cannot be compared to the 7.9% CFD average.
−No profit split, challenge cost, or funding data is provided for any meaningful industry comparison.

PROPDNA VERDICT