Smart Prop Trader vs Topstep

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

SMART PROP TRADER DETAILS

+Profit split of 85% is above the industry average of 84.7%.
+Minimum challenge cost of $97 is well below the industry average of $186.7.
+On-demand payouts, weekend holding, news trading, and EA use are all permitted.
+Supports multiple platforms including MT4 and MT5.

−Max funding of $800,000 is slightly below the industry average of $839,272.7.
−Days to first payout of 7 is marginally above the industry average of 6.5 days.
−No fee refund offered, adding cost risk for traders who do not pass the challenge.

+Profit split of 90% is well above the industry average of 84.7%, offering traders a superior earnings share.
+Min challenge cost of $49 is well below the industry average of $186.7, making entry highly accessible.
+Single-step funding is better than the industry average of 1.6 steps, streamlining the path to funded status.
+Founded in 2012, Topstep is one of the most established prop firms, providing strong credibility and track record.

−Max funding of $150,000 is far below the industry average of $839,272.7, significantly limiting earning potential.
−Overall drawdown of 10% with trailing EOD type means drawdown limits tighten as profits grow, increasing risk.
−Days to first payout at 7 is slightly above the industry average of 6.5, a minor but notable delay.

Smart Prop Trader

Lower trust score (55/100). Faster payouts at 7d. 85% profit split.

Topstep

Higher trust score (69/100). Faster payouts at 7d. 90% profit split.