RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
Smart Prop Trader vs Savius
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
SMPT
Smart Prop Trader
EST. 2022
SVUS
Savius
EST. 2013
SMART PROP TRADER
METRIC
SAVIUS
73/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
—0/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
85%—
PROFIT SPLIT
BETTER90%
$800,000BETTER
MAX FUNDING
—$300,000
$97BETTER
MIN COST
—$285
7d—
PAYOUT DAYS
BETTER3d
—
PASS RATE
—
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0
SMART PROP TRADER DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Fixed
- MARKETS
- Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals
- PLATFORMS
- MT4, MT5
- TYPES
- forex, large-cap
SAVIUS DETAILS
- STEPS
- 1-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Fixed
- MARKETS
- Futures, Indices
- PLATFORMS
- ATAS, Quantower
Smart Prop Trader PROS
- +Profit split of 85% is above the industry average of 84.7%.
- +Minimum challenge cost of $97 is well below the industry average of $186.7.
- +On-demand payouts, weekend holding, news trading, and EA use are all permitted.
- +Supports multiple platforms including MT4 and MT5.
Smart Prop Trader CONS
- −Max funding of $800,000 is slightly below the industry average of $839,272.7.
- −Days to first payout of 7 is marginally above the industry average of 6.5 days.
- −No fee refund offered, adding cost risk for traders who do not pass the challenge.
Savius PROS
- +Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.7% by 5.3 percentage points
- +Days to first payout is 3, significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days
- +Steps to funded is 1, well below the industry average of 1.6, simplifying the path to capital
- +Founded in 2013, making it one of the more established prop firms with over a decade of operation
Savius CONS
- −Max funding of $300,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272, limiting earning potential
- −Min challenge cost of $285 is significantly higher than the industry average of $186.70
- −Overall drawdown of 4% is considerably tighter than the industry average of 7.9%, increasing risk of disqualification
PROPDNA VERDICT
Smart Prop Trader
Higher trust score (73/100). Slower payouts at 7d. 85% profit split.
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy