RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
SabioTrade vs FundedNext
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
SBTR
SabioTrade
FNXT
FundedNext
✓ VERIFIEDEST. 2022
SABIOTRADE
METRIC
FUNDEDNEXT
0/100—
TRUST SCORE
BETTER88/100
0/5—
RATING
BETTER4.4/5
—
PROFIT SPLIT
95%
—
MAX FUNDING
$300,000
—
MIN COST
$49
—
PAYOUT DAYS
4d
—
PASS RATE
29%
0—
REVIEW COUNT
BETTER6,750
SABIOTRADE DETAILS
- STEPS
- -phase
FUNDEDNEXT DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Relative
- MARKETS
- Forex, Indices, Commodities, Futures, Crypto, Metals, Stocks
- PLATFORMS
- MT4, MT5, cTrader, TradingView
- TYPES
- forex, fast-payout, multi-asset, futures, crypto
SabioTrade PROS
- +Insufficient data provided to identify meaningful advantages for this firm.
- +Insufficient data provided to identify meaningful advantages for this firm.
- +Insufficient data provided to identify meaningful advantages for this firm.
- +Insufficient data provided to identify meaningful advantages for this firm.
SabioTrade CONS
- −No data was provided for this firm, making meaningful comparison impossible.
- −Traders cannot assess key metrics such as profit split, drawdown, or funding levels.
- −Lack of data represents a significant transparency concern for prospective traders.
FundedNext PROS
- +Profit split of 95% is well above the industry average of 84.7%.
- +Minimum challenge cost of $49 is well below the industry average of $186.7.
- +Days to first payout of 4 is faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
- +Fee refund is offered, and weekend holding, news trading, and EA use are all permitted.
FundedNext CONS
- −Overall drawdown of 10% with a relative drawdown type is above the industry average of 7.9% and more restrictive in practice.
- −Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, making evaluation harder to pass.
- −Max funding of $300,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7.
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy