RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
Seven Eight Capital vs Audacity Capital
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
S8CP
Seven Eight Capital
AUDC
Audacity Capital
EST. 2012
SEVEN EIGHT CAPITAL
METRIC
AUDACITY CAPITAL
0/100—
TRUST SCORE
BETTER60/100
0/5—
RATING
BETTER3.5/5
—
PROFIT SPLIT
90%
—
MAX FUNDING
$2,000,000
—
MIN COST
$42
—
PAYOUT DAYS
0d
—
PASS RATE
—
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0
SEVEN EIGHT CAPITAL DETAILS
- STEPS
- -phase
AUDACITY CAPITAL DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Static
- MARKETS
- Forex
- PLATFORMS
- MT5
Seven Eight Capital PROS
- +No data is available on profit split, funding, or cost metrics for this firm
- +No data is available on drawdown or profit target for this firm
- +No data is available on payout timing or steps to funded for this firm
- +No data is available on platforms, markets, or founding date for this firm
Seven Eight Capital CONS
- −Virtually no data is provided, making any objective evaluation impossible
- −Traders cannot compare this firm's terms to the industry average of 84.7% profit split
- −Lack of transparency on key metrics is a significant risk for traders making financial decisions
Audacity Capital PROS
- +Max funding of $2,000,000 is more than double the industry average of $839,272.7, offering exceptional capital access.
- +Min challenge cost of $42 is drastically below the industry average of $186.7, making entry highly accessible.
- +Days to first payout of 0 allows immediate profit access, well below the industry average of 6.5 days.
- +Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.7%, and fee refund is also offered, boosting net returns.
Audacity Capital CONS
- −Overall drawdown of 15% is nearly double the industry average of 7.9%, exposing traders to significantly higher risk.
- −Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, requiring stronger performance to complete evaluation.
- −Market coverage is limited to Forex only, restricting diversification across asset classes.
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy