RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
Seven Points Capital vs OneUp Trader
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
S7PC
Seven Points Capital
EST. 2007
OUPT
OneUp Trader
EST. 2017
SEVEN POINTS CAPITAL
METRIC
ONEUP TRADER
0/100—
TRUST SCORE
BETTER51/100
0/5—
RATING
BETTER4/5
—
PROFIT SPLIT
80%
—
MAX FUNDING
$250,000
—
MIN COST
$125
—
PAYOUT DAYS
14d
—
PASS RATE
—
0—
REVIEW COUNT
BETTER1
SEVEN POINTS CAPITAL DETAILS
- STEPS
- -phase
ONEUP TRADER DETAILS
- STEPS
- 1-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Fixed
- MARKETS
- Futures
- PLATFORMS
- NinjaTrader, Sierra Chart, Rithmic
- TYPES
- futures, large-cap
Seven Points Capital PROS
- +Founded in 2007, indicating over 15 years of operational longevity in the industry
- +No data is available on profit split to compare against the 84.7% industry average
- +No data is available on max funding to compare against the $839,272.7 industry average
- +No data is available on challenge cost to compare against the $186.7 industry average
Seven Points Capital CONS
- −Virtually no financial or trading metrics are provided beyond founding date and country
- −Traders cannot assess payout speed relative to the industry average of 6.5 days
- −Absence of drawdown, profit target, and steps data prevents any meaningful comparison
OneUp Trader PROS
- +Single-step funding process is faster than the industry average of 1.6 steps.
- +Minimum challenge cost of $125 is below the industry average of $186.7.
- +Profit target of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, making evaluation easier to pass.
- +Founded in 2017, making it one of the more established prop firms in the industry.
OneUp Trader CONS
- −Days to first payout of 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days.
- −Max funding of $250,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7.
- −Weekend holding is not allowed, restricting trader flexibility over weekends.
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy