RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Seven Points Capital vs Audacity Capital

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

S7PC
Seven Points Capital
EST. 2007
AUDC
Audacity Capital
EST. 2012
SEVEN POINTS CAPITAL
METRIC
AUDACITY CAPITAL
0/100
TRUST SCORE
BETTER60/100
0/5
RATING
BETTER3.5/5
PROFIT SPLIT
90%
MAX FUNDING
$2,000,000
MIN COST
$42
PAYOUT DAYS
0d
PASS RATE
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0

SEVEN POINTS CAPITAL DETAILS

STEPS
-phase

AUDACITY CAPITAL DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Static
MARKETS
Forex
PLATFORMS
MT5

Seven Points Capital PROS

  • +Founded in 2007, indicating over 15 years of operational longevity in the industry
  • +No data is available on profit split to compare against the 84.7% industry average
  • +No data is available on max funding to compare against the $839,272.7 industry average
  • +No data is available on challenge cost to compare against the $186.7 industry average

Seven Points Capital CONS

  • Virtually no financial or trading metrics are provided beyond founding date and country
  • Traders cannot assess payout speed relative to the industry average of 6.5 days
  • Absence of drawdown, profit target, and steps data prevents any meaningful comparison

Audacity Capital PROS

  • +Max funding of $2,000,000 is more than double the industry average of $839,272.7, offering exceptional capital access.
  • +Min challenge cost of $42 is drastically below the industry average of $186.7, making entry highly accessible.
  • +Days to first payout of 0 allows immediate profit access, well below the industry average of 6.5 days.
  • +Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.7%, and fee refund is also offered, boosting net returns.

Audacity Capital CONS

  • Overall drawdown of 15% is nearly double the industry average of 7.9%, exposing traders to significantly higher risk.
  • Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, requiring stronger performance to complete evaluation.
  • Market coverage is limited to Forex only, restricting diversification across asset classes.

PROPDNA VERDICT

Seven Points Capital
Lower trust score (0/100). Slower payouts at —d.
Audacity Capital
Higher trust score (60/100). Faster payouts at 0d. 90% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

Seven Points Capital Full Review →Audacity Capital Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy