RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
RebelsFunding vs QT Funded
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
RBLS
RebelsFunding
EST. 2023
QT
QT Funded
EST. 2023
REBELSFUNDING
METRIC
QT FUNDED
0/100—
TRUST SCORE
BETTER72/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
80%TIE
PROFIT SPLIT
TIE80%
$320,000—
MAX FUNDING
BETTER$400,000
$9BETTER
MIN COST
—$12
—
PAYOUT DAYS
1d
—
PASS RATE
—
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0
REBELSFUNDING DETAILS
- STEPS
- 4-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Fixed
- MARKETS
- Forex
QT FUNDED DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Fixed
- MARKETS
- Forex, Metals, Indices, Commodities, Crypto
- PLATFORMS
- MT5, cTrader, TradeLocker
RebelsFunding PROS
- +Min challenge cost of $9 is extraordinarily low compared to the industry average of $186.7, minimising entry risk.
- +Profit target of 5% is well below the industry average of 7.9%, making the challenge easier to complete.
- +Fee refund is available, giving traders the opportunity to recover the challenge cost.
- +Fixed drawdown type provides clearly defined and stable risk parameters for traders.
RebelsFunding CONS
- −Steps to funded is 4, far above the industry average of 1.6, requiring significantly more evaluation stages.
- −Max funding of $320,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting potential earnings.
- −Markets are limited to forex only, offering no diversification into indices, metals, commodities, or crypto.
QT Funded PROS
- +Minimum challenge cost of $12 is drastically below the industry average of $186.7.
- +Days to first payout of 1 day is far faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
- +Fee refund is available, reducing the financial risk of the challenge.
- +Profit target of 7% is below the industry average of 8%, making the target easier to hit.
QT Funded CONS
- −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%.
- −Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, indicating higher risk tolerance required.
- −News trading is not allowed, restricting a commonly used trading strategy.
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy