RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

RebelsFunding vs OspreyFX

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

RBLS
RebelsFunding
EST. 2023
OSPX
OspreyFX
REBELSFUNDING
METRIC
OSPREYFX
0/100TIE
TRUST SCORE
TIE0/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
80%
PROFIT SPLIT
$320,000
MAX FUNDING
$9
MIN COST
PAYOUT DAYS
PASS RATE
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0

REBELSFUNDING DETAILS

STEPS
4-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex

OSPREYFX DETAILS

STEPS
-phase

RebelsFunding PROS

  • +Min challenge cost of $9 is extraordinarily low compared to the industry average of $186.7, minimising entry risk.
  • +Profit target of 5% is well below the industry average of 7.9%, making the challenge easier to complete.
  • +Fee refund is available, giving traders the opportunity to recover the challenge cost.
  • +Fixed drawdown type provides clearly defined and stable risk parameters for traders.

RebelsFunding CONS

  • Steps to funded is 4, far above the industry average of 1.6, requiring significantly more evaluation stages.
  • Max funding of $320,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting potential earnings.
  • Markets are limited to forex only, offering no diversification into indices, metals, commodities, or crypto.

OspreyFX PROS

  • +Placeholder pro — no data provided beyond country; no metrics to evaluate
  • +Placeholder pro — no data provided beyond country; no metrics to evaluate
  • +Placeholder pro — no data provided beyond country; no metrics to evaluate
  • +Placeholder pro — no data provided beyond country; no metrics to evaluate

OspreyFX CONS

  • No trading metrics were provided, preventing any meaningful comparison to industry averages
  • Saint Vincent and the Grenadines is a low-regulation jurisdiction, raising oversight concerns
  • Absence of profit split, funding cap, or payout data limits trader due diligence

PROPDNA VERDICT

RebelsFunding
Higher trust score (0/100). Faster payouts at —d. 80% profit split.
OspreyFX
Higher trust score (0/100). Faster payouts at —d.

RELATED LINKS

RebelsFunding Full Review →OspreyFX Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy