RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
RebelsFunding vs Lucid Trading
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
RBLS
RebelsFunding
EST. 2023
LCDT
Lucid Trading
REBELSFUNDING
METRIC
LUCID TRADING
0/100TIE
TRUST SCORE
TIE0/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
80%—
PROFIT SPLIT
BETTER90%
$320,000
MAX FUNDING
—
$9BETTER
MIN COST
—$90
—
PAYOUT DAYS
1d
—
PASS RATE
—
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0
REBELSFUNDING DETAILS
- STEPS
- 4-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Fixed
- MARKETS
- Forex
LUCID TRADING DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Trailing EOD
- MARKETS
- Futures
- PLATFORMS
- NinjaTrader, Tradovate, Rithmic, MotiveWave, QuantTower
RebelsFunding PROS
- +Min challenge cost of $9 is extraordinarily low compared to the industry average of $186.7, minimising entry risk.
- +Profit target of 5% is well below the industry average of 7.9%, making the challenge easier to complete.
- +Fee refund is available, giving traders the opportunity to recover the challenge cost.
- +Fixed drawdown type provides clearly defined and stable risk parameters for traders.
RebelsFunding CONS
- −Steps to funded is 4, far above the industry average of 1.6, requiring significantly more evaluation stages.
- −Max funding of $320,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting potential earnings.
- −Markets are limited to forex only, offering no diversification into indices, metals, commodities, or crypto.
Lucid Trading PROS
- +Profit split of 90% is above the industry average of 84.7%
- +Days to first payout of 1 is significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days
- +On-demand payouts offer maximum flexibility in accessing earned profits
- +Wide platform selection including NinjaTrader, Tradovate, Rithmic, MotiveWave, and QuantTower
Lucid Trading CONS
- −No max funding data provided, preventing comparison to the industry average of $839,272.70
- −Profit target of 8% is slightly above the industry average of 7.9%, marginally harder to achieve
- −Trailing EOD drawdown type can be more restrictive than fixed drawdown structures
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy