RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

RebelsFunding vs ICFunded

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

RBLS
RebelsFunding
EST. 2023
ICFD
ICFunded
REBELSFUNDING
METRIC
ICFUNDED
42/100
TRUST SCORE
BETTER56/100
3/5
RATING
BETTER4.4/5
80%TIE
PROFIT SPLIT
TIE80%
$320,000
MAX FUNDING
BETTER$500,000
$9BETTER
MIN COST
$74
PAYOUT DAYS
14d
PASS RATE
1
REVIEW COUNT
BETTER2

REBELSFUNDING DETAILS

STEPS
4-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex

ICFUNDED DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
static
MARKETS
forex, indices, metals, commodities, crypto
PLATFORMS
mt5
TYPES
forex, futures

RebelsFunding PROS

  • +Min challenge cost of $9 is extraordinarily low compared to the industry average of $186.7, minimising entry risk.
  • +Profit target of 5% is well below the industry average of 7.9%, making the challenge easier to complete.
  • +Fee refund is available, giving traders the opportunity to recover the challenge cost.
  • +Fixed drawdown type provides clearly defined and stable risk parameters for traders.

RebelsFunding CONS

  • Steps to funded is 4, far above the industry average of 1.6, requiring significantly more evaluation stages.
  • Max funding of $320,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting potential earnings.
  • Markets are limited to forex only, offering no diversification into indices, metals, commodities, or crypto.

ICFunded PROS

  • +Min challenge cost of $74 is well below the industry average of $186.7, lowering entry costs.
  • +Profit split of 80% is provided with bi-weekly payouts, offering regular income access.
  • +Static drawdown type provides clear, fixed risk boundaries for traders to plan around.
  • +Markets include forex, indices, metals, commodities, and crypto, offering reasonable diversification.

ICFunded CONS

  • Max funding of $500,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting upside potential.
  • Key data including days to first payout, profit target, drawdown percentage, and trading condition rules are not provided, limiting transparency.
  • Only MT5 is listed as a platform, offering less choice than most competitors with multiple platform options.

PROPDNA VERDICT

RebelsFunding
Lower trust score (42/100). Slower payouts at —d. 80% profit split.
ICFunded
Higher trust score (56/100). Faster payouts at 14d. 80% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

RebelsFunding Full Review →ICFunded Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy