RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

RebelsFunding vs FuturesElite

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

RBLS

RebelsFunding

EST. 2023

FTEL

FuturesElite

REBELSFUNDING

METRIC

FUTURESELITE

42/100—

TRUST SCORE

BETTER59/100

3/5—

RATING

BETTER4/5

80%—

PROFIT SPLIT

BETTER100%

$320,000BETTER

MAX FUNDING

—$150,000

$9BETTER

MIN COST

—$79

—

PAYOUT DAYS

—

PASS RATE

—

1TIE

REVIEW COUNT

TIE1

REBELSFUNDING DETAILS

STEPS: 4-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Forex

FUTURESELITE DETAILS

STEPS: 1-phase
DRAWDOWN: Trailing
MARKETS: Futures
PLATFORMS: Tradovate, NinjaTrader, Quantower, Atas

RebelsFunding PROS

+Min challenge cost of $9 is extraordinarily low compared to the industry average of $186.7, minimising entry risk.
+Profit target of 5% is well below the industry average of 7.9%, making the challenge easier to complete.
+Fee refund is available, giving traders the opportunity to recover the challenge cost.
+Fixed drawdown type provides clearly defined and stable risk parameters for traders.

RebelsFunding CONS

−Steps to funded is 4, far above the industry average of 1.6, requiring significantly more evaluation stages.
−Max funding of $320,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting potential earnings.
−Markets are limited to forex only, offering no diversification into indices, metals, commodities, or crypto.

FuturesElite PROS

+Profit split of 100% is exceptional and far above the industry average of 84.7%, maximising trader earnings.
+Days to first payout of 1 is far faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
+Steps to funded is 1, well below the industry average of 1.6, enabling faster access to capital.
+Profit target of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, making the challenge easier to achieve.

FuturesElite CONS

−Max funding of $150,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting earning potential.
−Overall drawdown is dollar-denominated at $2,000 and cannot be meaningfully compared to the percentage-based industry average.
−No daily drawdown limit is listed, which may introduce uncertainty around intraday risk controls.

PROPDNA VERDICT

RebelsFunding

Lower trust score (42/100). Slower payouts at —d. 80% profit split.

START WITH RBLS