RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

RebelsFunding vs Funded Futures Family

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

RBLS

RebelsFunding

EST. 2023

FFAM

Funded Futures Family

REBELSFUNDING

METRIC

FUNDED FUTURES FAMILY

0/100TIE

TRUST SCORE

TIE0/100

0/5TIE

RATING

TIE0/5

80%

PROFIT SPLIT

—

$320,000

MAX FUNDING

—

MIN COST

—

PAYOUT DAYS

—

PASS RATE

—

0TIE

REVIEW COUNT

TIE0

REBELSFUNDING DETAILS

STEPS: 4-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Forex

FUNDED FUTURES FAMILY DETAILS

STEPS: -phase

RebelsFunding PROS

+Min challenge cost of $9 is extraordinarily low compared to the industry average of $186.7, minimising entry risk.
+Profit target of 5% is well below the industry average of 7.9%, making the challenge easier to complete.
+Fee refund is available, giving traders the opportunity to recover the challenge cost.
+Fixed drawdown type provides clearly defined and stable risk parameters for traders.

RebelsFunding CONS

−Steps to funded is 4, far above the industry average of 1.6, requiring significantly more evaluation stages.
−Max funding of $320,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting potential earnings.
−Markets are limited to forex only, offering no diversification into indices, metals, commodities, or crypto.

Funded Futures Family PROS

+US-based firm operating in a well-known financial jurisdiction.
+No further data is available to substantiate additional pros at this time.
+No platform or market data is provided to assess trading conditions.
+No funding or cost data is available to compare against industry benchmarks.

Funded Futures Family CONS

−Almost no operational data is available for Funded Futures Family, making meaningful comparison impossible.
−Note: as a futures firm, drawdown is likely expressed in dollar terms and cannot be compared to the 7.9% CFD average.
−Traders cannot evaluate profit potential or risk parameters without any disclosed key metrics.

PROPDNA VERDICT

RebelsFunding

Higher trust score (0/100). Faster payouts at —d. 80% profit split.

START WITH RBLS