RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
RebelsFunding vs Funderpro
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
RBLS
RebelsFunding
EST. 2023
FDRP
Funderpro
EST. 2023
REBELSFUNDING
METRIC
FUNDERPRO
42/100—
TRUST SCORE
BETTER65/100
3/5—
RATING
BETTER4.78/5
80%TIE
PROFIT SPLIT
TIE80%
$320,000BETTER
MAX FUNDING
—$200,000
$9BETTER
MIN COST
—$79
—
PAYOUT DAYS
1d
—
PASS RATE
—
1—
REVIEW COUNT
BETTER3
REBELSFUNDING DETAILS
- STEPS
- 4-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Fixed
- MARKETS
- Forex
FUNDERPRO DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Fixed
- MARKETS
- Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals, Crypto
- PLATFORMS
- MT5, cTrader, TradeLocker, Match-Trader
RebelsFunding PROS
- +Min challenge cost of $9 is extraordinarily low compared to the industry average of $186.7, minimising entry risk.
- +Profit target of 5% is well below the industry average of 7.9%, making the challenge easier to complete.
- +Fee refund is available, giving traders the opportunity to recover the challenge cost.
- +Fixed drawdown type provides clearly defined and stable risk parameters for traders.
RebelsFunding CONS
- −Steps to funded is 4, far above the industry average of 1.6, requiring significantly more evaluation stages.
- −Max funding of $320,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting potential earnings.
- −Markets are limited to forex only, offering no diversification into indices, metals, commodities, or crypto.
Funderpro PROS
- +Days to first payout of 1 is far below the industry average of 6.5 days
- +Min challenge cost of $79 is well below the industry average of $186.7
- +Fee refund is available, reducing the financial risk of the evaluation process
- +Four platforms supported (MT5, cTrader, TradeLocker, Match-Trader) offering broad trader choice
Funderpro CONS
- −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%
- −Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, requiring more gain to pass evaluation
- −Weekend holding is not allowed, restricting flexibility for swing traders
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy