RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

RebelsFunding vs Elite Trader Funding

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

RBLS

RebelsFunding

EST. 2023

ELTF

Elite Trader Funding

EST. 2021

REBELSFUNDING

METRIC

ELITE TRADER FUNDING

0/100—

TRUST SCORE

BETTER74/100

0/5TIE

RATING

TIE0/5

80%TIE

PROFIT SPLIT

TIE80%

$320,000BETTER

MAX FUNDING

—$300,000

$9BETTER

MIN COST

—$150

—

PAYOUT DAYS

14d

—

PASS RATE

—

0TIE

REVIEW COUNT

TIE0

REBELSFUNDING DETAILS

STEPS: 4-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Forex

ELITE TRADER FUNDING DETAILS

STEPS: 1-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Futures
PLATFORMS: NinjaTrader, Rithmic, Tradovate
TYPES: futures, large-cap

RebelsFunding PROS

+Min challenge cost of $9 is extraordinarily low compared to the industry average of $186.7, minimising entry risk.
+Profit target of 5% is well below the industry average of 7.9%, making the challenge easier to complete.
+Fee refund is available, giving traders the opportunity to recover the challenge cost.
+Fixed drawdown type provides clearly defined and stable risk parameters for traders.

RebelsFunding CONS

−Steps to funded is 4, far above the industry average of 1.6, requiring significantly more evaluation stages.
−Max funding of $320,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting potential earnings.
−Markets are limited to forex only, offering no diversification into indices, metals, commodities, or crypto.

Elite Trader Funding PROS

+Single-step funding process is faster than the industry average of 1.6 steps to get funded.
+Min challenge cost of $150 is below the industry average of $186.7, lowering the entry barrier.
+News trading and EA/automated trading are both permitted, offering strong flexibility for diverse strategies.
+Profit target of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, making the evaluation stage easier to pass.

Elite Trader Funding CONS

−Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%, meaning traders keep less of their earnings.
−Max funding of $300,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting earning potential.
−Days to first payout at 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days, slowing cash flow.

PROPDNA VERDICT

RebelsFunding

Lower trust score (0/100). Slower payouts at —d. 80% profit split.

START WITH RBLS