RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

RebelsFunding vs Aqua Funded

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

RBLS

RebelsFunding

EST. 2023

AQUA

Aqua Funded

EST. 2023

REBELSFUNDING

METRIC

AQUA FUNDED

42/100—

TRUST SCORE

BETTER59/100

3/5—

RATING

BETTER4/5

80%—

PROFIT SPLIT

BETTER90%

$320,000—

MAX FUNDING

BETTER$2,000,000

$9—

MIN COST

BETTER$1

—

PAYOUT DAYS

—

PASS RATE

—

1—

REVIEW COUNT

BETTER2

REBELSFUNDING DETAILS

STEPS: 4-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Forex

AQUA FUNDED DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
DRAWDOWN: Trailing
MARKETS: Forex, Indices, Metals, Commodities, Crypto
PLATFORMS: MT5, cTrader, Match-Trader, TradeLocker

RebelsFunding PROS

+Min challenge cost of $9 is extraordinarily low compared to the industry average of $186.7, minimising entry risk.
+Profit target of 5% is well below the industry average of 7.9%, making the challenge easier to complete.
+Fee refund is available, giving traders the opportunity to recover the challenge cost.
+Fixed drawdown type provides clearly defined and stable risk parameters for traders.

RebelsFunding CONS

−Steps to funded is 4, far above the industry average of 1.6, requiring significantly more evaluation stages.
−Max funding of $320,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting potential earnings.
−Markets are limited to forex only, offering no diversification into indices, metals, commodities, or crypto.

Aqua Funded PROS

+Min challenge cost of just $1 is exceptionally below the industry average of $186.7, making it highly accessible.
+Max funding of $2,000,000 is more than double the industry average of $839,272.7.
+Profit split of 90% significantly exceeds the industry average of 84.7%.
+Weekend holding, news trading, and EA use are all permitted, offering maximum trading flexibility.

Aqua Funded CONS

−Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, requiring traders to manage larger potential losses.
−Profit target of 10% is higher than the industry average of 7.9%, making the challenge harder to pass.
−Days to first payout of 7 is slightly above the industry average of 6.5 days.

PROPDNA VERDICT

RebelsFunding

Lower trust score (42/100). Slower payouts at —d. 80% profit split.

START WITH RBLS