RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
RebelsFunding vs OneFunded
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
RBLS
RebelsFunding
EST. 2023
1FND
OneFunded
✓ VERIFIEDEST. 2023
REBELSFUNDING
METRIC
ONEFUNDED
0/100—
TRUST SCORE
BETTER55/100
0/5—
RATING
BETTER1/5
80%—
PROFIT SPLIT
BETTER90%
$320,000BETTER
MAX FUNDING
—$200,000
$9BETTER
MIN COST
—$59
—
PAYOUT DAYS
14d
—
PASS RATE
35%
0—
REVIEW COUNT
BETTER1
REBELSFUNDING DETAILS
- STEPS
- 4-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Fixed
- MARKETS
- Forex
ONEFUNDED DETAILS
- STEPS
- 1-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Fixed
- MARKETS
- Forex, Indices, Crypto, Metals, Stocks
- PLATFORMS
- MT5, cTrader
- TYPES
- forex, beginner, multi-asset, crypto
RebelsFunding PROS
- +Min challenge cost of $9 is extraordinarily low compared to the industry average of $186.7, minimising entry risk.
- +Profit target of 5% is well below the industry average of 7.9%, making the challenge easier to complete.
- +Fee refund is available, giving traders the opportunity to recover the challenge cost.
- +Fixed drawdown type provides clearly defined and stable risk parameters for traders.
RebelsFunding CONS
- −Steps to funded is 4, far above the industry average of 1.6, requiring significantly more evaluation stages.
- −Max funding of $320,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting potential earnings.
- −Markets are limited to forex only, offering no diversification into indices, metals, commodities, or crypto.
OneFunded PROS
- +No time limits on eval
- +4 challenge tracks
- +Transparent rules
OneFunded CONS
- −Days to first payout is 14, more than double the industry average of 6.5 days
- −Max funding of $200,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272
- −Pass rate of 35% suggests moderate selectivity, though no drawdown or profit target data is provided for context
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy