RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

QT Funded vs V Prop Trader

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

QT Funded

EST. 2023

VPRT

V Prop Trader

QT FUNDED

METRIC

V PROP TRADER

72/100BETTER

TRUST SCORE

—0/100

0/5TIE

RATING

TIE0/5

80%—

PROFIT SPLIT

BETTER95%

$400,000

MAX FUNDING

—

$12

MIN COST

—

1d—

PAYOUT DAYS

BETTER0d

—

PASS RATE

—

0TIE

REVIEW COUNT

TIE0

QT FUNDED DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Forex, Metals, Indices, Commodities, Crypto
PLATFORMS: MT5, cTrader, TradeLocker

V PROP TRADER DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
MARKETS: Forex, Crypto
PLATFORMS: MT5, VTrader

QT Funded PROS

+Minimum challenge cost of $12 is drastically below the industry average of $186.7.
+Days to first payout of 1 day is far faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
+Fee refund is available, reducing the financial risk of the challenge.
+Profit target of 7% is below the industry average of 8%, making the target easier to hit.

QT Funded CONS

−Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%.
−Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, indicating higher risk tolerance required.
−News trading is not allowed, restricting a commonly used trading strategy.

V Prop Trader PROS

+Profit split of 95% is significantly above the industry average of 84.7%, maximising trader earnings.
+Days to first payout of 0 means traders can access profits immediately, well below the industry average of 6.5 days.
+Offers MT5 alongside the proprietary VTrader platform, providing at least one widely recognised trading environment.
+Covers both Forex and Crypto markets, giving traders access to high-liquidity and high-volatility asset classes.

V Prop Trader CONS

−No max funding, challenge cost, or drawdown data is provided for comparison against industry averages.
−Two steps to funded is above the industry average of 1.6, requiring additional evaluation stages.
−Limited market coverage of only two asset classes may restrict diversification compared to broader offerings.

PROPDNA VERDICT

QT Funded

Higher trust score (72/100). Slower payouts at 1d. 80% profit split.

START WITH QT