RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

QT Funded vs TradeXprop

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

QT Funded
QT
QT Funded
EST. 2023
TradeXprop
TXPR
TradeXprop
EST. 2023
QT FUNDED
METRIC
TRADEXPROP
72/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
58/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
80%TIE
PROFIT SPLIT
TIE80%
$400,000TIE
MAX FUNDING
TIE$400,000
$12BETTER
MIN COST
$59
1dBETTER
PAYOUT DAYS
3d
PASS RATE
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0

QT FUNDED DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex, Metals, Indices, Commodities, Crypto
PLATFORMS
MT5, cTrader, TradeLocker

TRADEXPROP DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Metals, Commodities, Crypto
PLATFORMS
cTrader, MT4, MT5

QT Funded PROS

  • +Minimum challenge cost of $12 is drastically below the industry average of $186.7.
  • +Days to first payout of 1 day is far faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
  • +Fee refund is available, reducing the financial risk of the challenge.
  • +Profit target of 7% is below the industry average of 8%, making the target easier to hit.

QT Funded CONS

  • Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%.
  • Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, indicating higher risk tolerance required.
  • News trading is not allowed, restricting a commonly used trading strategy.

TradeXprop PROS

  • +Minimum challenge cost of $59 is significantly below the industry average of $186.7.
  • +Days to first payout of 3 days is faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
  • +Overall drawdown of 9% is slightly above average but paired with broad market access including Crypto.
  • +EA/automated trading and weekend holding are both permitted.

TradeXprop CONS

  • Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%.
  • News trading is not allowed, limiting strategy flexibility for traders.
  • Max funding of $400,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7.

PROPDNA VERDICT

QT Funded
Higher trust score (72/100). Faster payouts at 1d. 80% profit split.
TradeXprop
Lower trust score (58/100). Slower payouts at 3d. 80% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

QT Funded Full Review →TradeXprop Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy