PropDNA
Search firms, traders…⌘K
Compare/QT Funded vs The Trading Pit
HEAD-TO-HEAD · 2026

QT Funded vs The Trading Pit

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

METRIC
QT
QT Funded
EST. 2023
TTP
The Trading Pit
EST. 2022
TRUST SCORE64/100BETTER63/100
PROFIT SPLIT80%TIE80%TIE
PAYOUT DAYS1dTIE1dTIE
PASS RATE
MIN COST$12BETTER$99
MAX FUNDING$400,000$5,000,000BETTER
RATING5/5BETTER4.33/5
REVIEW COUNT2TIE2TIE
STEPS2-step2-step
DRAWDOWNFixedTrailing EOD

QT FUNDED DETAILS

MARKETS
Forex, Metals, Indices, Commodities, Crypto
PLATFORMS
MT5, cTrader, TradeLocker

THE TRADING PIT DETAILS

MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Metals, Commodities, Crypto, Stocks, Futures
PLATFORMS
MT4, MT5, NinjaTrader, Rithmic, cTrader

QT Funded PROS

  • +Minimum challenge cost of $12 is drastically below the industry average of $186.7.
  • +Days to first payout of 1 day is far faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
  • +Fee refund is available, reducing the financial risk of the challenge.
  • +Profit target of 7% is below the industry average of 8%, making the target easier to hit.

QT Funded CONS

  • Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%.
  • Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, indicating higher risk tolerance required.
  • News trading is not allowed, restricting a commonly used trading strategy.

The Trading Pit PROS

  • +Max funding of $5,000,000 is far above the industry average of $839,272.7
  • +Days to first payout of 1 is far below the industry average of 6.5 days
  • +Fee refund is available, reducing the financial risk of the evaluation process
  • +Broadest market access listed, covering Forex, Indices, Metals, Commodities, Crypto, Stocks, and Futures

The Trading Pit CONS

  • Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%
  • Trailing EOD drawdown type is more restrictive than a fixed drawdown structure
  • Two steps to funded is slightly above the industry average of 1.6 steps

PROPDNA VERDICT

QT Funded
Higher trust score (64/100). Faster payouts at 1d. 80% profit split.
The Trading Pit
Lower trust score (63/100). Faster payouts at 1d. 80% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

QT Funded Full Review →The Trading Pit Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA
RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy