RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

QT Funded vs Simplex Trading

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

QT Funded
QT
QT Funded
EST. 2023
SPLX
Simplex Trading
EST. 2004
QT FUNDED
METRIC
SIMPLEX TRADING
72/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
0/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
80%
PROFIT SPLIT
$400,000
MAX FUNDING
$12
MIN COST
1d
PAYOUT DAYS
PASS RATE
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0

QT FUNDED DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex, Metals, Indices, Commodities, Crypto
PLATFORMS
MT5, cTrader, TradeLocker

SIMPLEX TRADING DETAILS

STEPS
-phase

QT Funded PROS

  • +Minimum challenge cost of $12 is drastically below the industry average of $186.7.
  • +Days to first payout of 1 day is far faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
  • +Fee refund is available, reducing the financial risk of the challenge.
  • +Profit target of 7% is below the industry average of 8%, making the target easier to hit.

QT Funded CONS

  • Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%.
  • Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, indicating higher risk tolerance required.
  • News trading is not allowed, restricting a commonly used trading strategy.

Simplex Trading PROS

  • +Founded in 2004, giving Simplex Trading over 20 years of operational history, suggesting longevity.
  • +US-based firm operating in a well-known financial jurisdiction.
  • +Long track record may indicate institutional-level stability compared to newer prop firms.
  • +No further data is available to substantiate additional pros at this time.

Simplex Trading CONS

  • No key metrics such as profit split, drawdown, funding levels, or challenge cost are provided.
  • Absence of platform and market data makes it impossible to assess trading conditions.
  • Traders cannot compare Simplex Trading against industry averages without core financial data.

PROPDNA VERDICT

QT Funded
Higher trust score (72/100). Faster payouts at 1d. 80% profit split.
Simplex Trading
Lower trust score (0/100). Slower payouts at —d.

RELATED LINKS

QT Funded Full Review →Simplex Trading Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy