RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

QT Funded vs Pip Traders Funding

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

QT Funded

EST. 2023

PTFD

Pip Traders Funding

QT FUNDED

METRIC

PIP TRADERS FUNDING

64/100BETTER

TRUST SCORE

—40/100

5/5BETTER

RATING

—0/5

80%

PROFIT SPLIT

—

$400,000

MAX FUNDING

—

$12

MIN COST

—

PAYOUT DAYS

—

PASS RATE

—

2BETTER

REVIEW COUNT

—0

QT FUNDED DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Forex, Metals, Indices, Commodities, Crypto
PLATFORMS: MT5, cTrader, TradeLocker

PIP TRADERS FUNDING DETAILS

STEPS: -phase

QT Funded PROS

+Minimum challenge cost of $12 is drastically below the industry average of $186.7.
+Days to first payout of 1 day is far faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
+Fee refund is available, reducing the financial risk of the challenge.
+Profit target of 7% is below the industry average of 8%, making the target easier to hit.

QT Funded CONS

−Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%.
−Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, indicating higher risk tolerance required.
−News trading is not allowed, restricting a commonly used trading strategy.

Pip Traders Funding PROS

+The firm name implies a focus on forex funding, which is the most widely traded market globally.
+A dedicated funding model suggests a structured approach to trader evaluation and capital allocation.
+Pip-based performance naming may indicate a focus on measurable, transparent trading metrics.
+Inclusion on a comparison platform indicates some degree of public presence and accountability.

Pip Traders Funding CONS

−No data has been provided for this firm, making any objective evaluation impossible.
−Without profit split, drawdown, funding levels, or challenge cost data, no industry comparisons can be made.
−Traders cannot make informed decisions without disclosure of core terms and conditions for this firm.

PROPDNA VERDICT

QT Funded

Higher trust score (64/100). Faster payouts at 1d. 80% profit split.

START WITH QT