RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

QT Funded vs Monevis Funding

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

QT Funded

EST. 2023

MNVF

Monevis Funding

EST. 2024

QT FUNDED

METRIC

MONEVIS FUNDING

72/100BETTER

TRUST SCORE

—0/100

0/5TIE

RATING

TIE0/5

80%

PROFIT SPLIT

—

$400,000

MAX FUNDING

—

$12

MIN COST

—

PAYOUT DAYS

—

PASS RATE

—

0TIE

REVIEW COUNT

TIE0

QT FUNDED DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Forex, Metals, Indices, Commodities, Crypto
PLATFORMS: MT5, cTrader, TradeLocker

MONEVIS FUNDING DETAILS

STEPS: -phase
DRAWDOWN: Static

QT Funded PROS

+Minimum challenge cost of $12 is drastically below the industry average of $186.7.
+Days to first payout of 1 day is far faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
+Fee refund is available, reducing the financial risk of the challenge.
+Profit target of 7% is below the industry average of 8%, making the target easier to hit.

QT Funded CONS

−Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%.
−Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, indicating higher risk tolerance required.
−News trading is not allowed, restricting a commonly used trading strategy.

Monevis Funding PROS

+Static drawdown type provides a fixed, predictable risk boundary, which some traders prefer for planning.
+Czech Republic is an EU-member jurisdiction, which may offer relevant regulatory context.
+No platform or market data is available to assess further strengths.
+No funding or cost data is provided to compare against industry benchmarks.

Monevis Funding CONS

−Founded in 2024, making Monevis Funding a very new firm with limited operational track record.
−No profit split, max funding, or challenge cost data is available for comparison against industry averages.
−Lack of transparency around key metrics is a concern for traders making informed decisions.

PROPDNA VERDICT

QT Funded

Higher trust score (72/100). Faster payouts at 1d. 80% profit split.

START WITH QT