RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

QT Funded vs Lirunex

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

QT Funded
QT
QT Funded
EST. 2023
LRNX
Lirunex
QT FUNDED
METRIC
LIRUNEX
72/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
0/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
80%
PROFIT SPLIT
$400,000
MAX FUNDING
$12
MIN COST
1d
PAYOUT DAYS
PASS RATE
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0

QT FUNDED DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex, Metals, Indices, Commodities, Crypto
PLATFORMS
MT5, cTrader, TradeLocker

LIRUNEX DETAILS

STEPS
-phase

QT Funded PROS

  • +Minimum challenge cost of $12 is drastically below the industry average of $186.7.
  • +Days to first payout of 1 day is far faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
  • +Fee refund is available, reducing the financial risk of the challenge.
  • +Profit target of 7% is below the industry average of 8%, making the target easier to hit.

QT Funded CONS

  • Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%.
  • Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, indicating higher risk tolerance required.
  • News trading is not allowed, restricting a commonly used trading strategy.

Lirunex PROS

  • +Country of operation is listed as Hong Kong, indicating an established international jurisdiction.
  • +A registered tag suggests some formal industry presence.
  • +No confirmed below-average financial metrics are currently on record.
  • +Listing on a comparison platform indicates an intent toward transparency.

Lirunex CONS

  • No trading or financial metrics are available to evaluate this firm objectively.
  • Without data on profit split, funding, or costs, no comparison to industry averages is possible.
  • Traders cannot assess payout speed, drawdown rules, or profit targets from available data.

PROPDNA VERDICT

QT Funded
Higher trust score (72/100). Faster payouts at 1d. 80% profit split.
Lirunex
Lower trust score (0/100). Slower payouts at —d.

RELATED LINKS

QT Funded Full Review →Lirunex Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy