RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

QT Funded vs Lark Funding

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

QT Funded

EST. 2023

LRKF

Lark Funding

EST. 2022

QT FUNDED

METRIC

LARK FUNDING

72/100BETTER

TRUST SCORE

—0/100

0/5TIE

RATING

TIE0/5

80%TIE

PROFIT SPLIT

TIE80%

$400,000BETTER

MAX FUNDING

—$200,000

$12BETTER

MIN COST

—$200

1dTIE

PAYOUT DAYS

TIE1d

—

PASS RATE

—

0TIE

REVIEW COUNT

TIE0

QT FUNDED DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Forex, Metals, Indices, Commodities, Crypto
PLATFORMS: MT5, cTrader, TradeLocker

LARK FUNDING DETAILS

STEPS: 1-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Forex

QT Funded PROS

+Minimum challenge cost of $12 is drastically below the industry average of $186.7.
+Days to first payout of 1 day is far faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
+Fee refund is available, reducing the financial risk of the challenge.
+Profit target of 7% is below the industry average of 8%, making the target easier to hit.

QT Funded CONS

−Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%.
−Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, indicating higher risk tolerance required.
−News trading is not allowed, restricting a commonly used trading strategy.

Lark Funding PROS

+Days to first payout of 1 is exceptionally faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
+Single-step funding process is faster than the industry average of 1.6 steps.
+News trading is permitted, giving traders additional strategic flexibility.
+Minimum challenge cost of $200 is close to the industry average of $186.7, offering a recognizable entry point.

Lark Funding CONS

−Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%.
−Max funding of $200,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7.
−Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, making the evaluation harder to pass.

PROPDNA VERDICT

QT Funded

Higher trust score (72/100). Faster payouts at 1d. 80% profit split.

START WITH QT