RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

QT Funded vs FundedNext

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

QT Funded

EST. 2023

FNXT

FundedNext

✓ VERIFIEDEST. 2022

QT FUNDED

METRIC

FUNDEDNEXT

72/100—

TRUST SCORE

BETTER88/100

0/5—

RATING

BETTER4.4/5

80%—

PROFIT SPLIT

BETTER95%

$400,000BETTER

MAX FUNDING

—$300,000

$12BETTER

MIN COST

—$49

1dBETTER

PAYOUT DAYS

—4d

—

PASS RATE

29%

0—

REVIEW COUNT

BETTER6,750

QT FUNDED DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Forex, Metals, Indices, Commodities, Crypto
PLATFORMS: MT5, cTrader, TradeLocker

FUNDEDNEXT DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
DRAWDOWN: Relative
MARKETS: Forex, Indices, Commodities, Futures, Crypto, Metals, Stocks
PLATFORMS: MT4, MT5, cTrader, TradingView
TYPES: forex, fast-payout, multi-asset, futures, crypto

QT Funded PROS

+Minimum challenge cost of $12 is drastically below the industry average of $186.7.
+Days to first payout of 1 day is far faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
+Fee refund is available, reducing the financial risk of the challenge.
+Profit target of 7% is below the industry average of 8%, making the target easier to hit.

QT Funded CONS

−Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%.
−Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, indicating higher risk tolerance required.
−News trading is not allowed, restricting a commonly used trading strategy.

FundedNext PROS

+Profit split of 95% is well above the industry average of 84.7%.
+Minimum challenge cost of $49 is well below the industry average of $186.7.
+Days to first payout of 4 is faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
+Fee refund is offered, and weekend holding, news trading, and EA use are all permitted.

FundedNext CONS

−Overall drawdown of 10% with a relative drawdown type is above the industry average of 7.9% and more restrictive in practice.
−Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, making evaluation harder to pass.
−Max funding of $300,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7.

PROPDNA VERDICT

QT Funded

Lower trust score (72/100). Faster payouts at 1d. 80% profit split.

START WITH QT