RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

QT Funded vs Eightcap Challenges

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

QT Funded

EST. 2023

ECHT

Eightcap Challenges

QT FUNDED

METRIC

EIGHTCAP CHALLENGES

72/100BETTER

TRUST SCORE

—0/100

0/5TIE

RATING

TIE0/5

80%—

PROFIT SPLIT

BETTER90%

$400,000BETTER

MAX FUNDING

—$200,000

$12—

MIN COST

BETTER$5

PAYOUT DAYS

—

PASS RATE

—

0TIE

REVIEW COUNT

TIE0

QT FUNDED DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Forex, Metals, Indices, Commodities, Crypto
PLATFORMS: MT5, cTrader, TradeLocker

EIGHTCAP CHALLENGES DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
DRAWDOWN: Static
MARKETS: Forex, Indices, Commodities, Stocks
PLATFORMS: MT5, TradeLocker, MT4

QT Funded PROS

+Minimum challenge cost of $12 is drastically below the industry average of $186.7.
+Days to first payout of 1 day is far faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
+Fee refund is available, reducing the financial risk of the challenge.
+Profit target of 7% is below the industry average of 8%, making the target easier to hit.

QT Funded CONS

−Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%.
−Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, indicating higher risk tolerance required.
−News trading is not allowed, restricting a commonly used trading strategy.

Eightcap Challenges PROS

+Minimum challenge cost of $5 is exceptionally low compared to the industry average of $186.7.
+Profit split of 90% is notably above the industry average of 84.7%.
+Profit target of 9% is slightly above average but paired with a strong 90% split.
+Broad market access includes Forex, Indices, Commodities, and Stocks across multiple platforms.

Eightcap Challenges CONS

−Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, posing higher risk.
−No days-to-first-payout data is available, limiting transparency on withdrawal timelines.
−No founding date or country detail is fully confirmed, limiting background verification for traders.

PROPDNA VERDICT

QT Funded

Higher trust score (72/100). Faster payouts at 1d. 80% profit split.

START WITH QT