RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

QT Funded vs BuoyTrade

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

QT Funded

EST. 2023

BUOY

BuoyTrade

QT FUNDED

METRIC

BUOYTRADE

72/100BETTER

TRUST SCORE

—0/100

0/5TIE

RATING

TIE0/5

80%TIE

PROFIT SPLIT

TIE80%

$400,000—

MAX FUNDING

BETTER$1,024,000

$12BETTER

MIN COST

—$50

1dBETTER

PAYOUT DAYS

—14d

—

PASS RATE

—

0TIE

REVIEW COUNT

TIE0

QT FUNDED DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Forex, Metals, Indices, Commodities, Crypto
PLATFORMS: MT5, cTrader, TradeLocker

BUOYTRADE DETAILS

STEPS: 1-phase
DRAWDOWN: Static
MARKETS: Forex
PLATFORMS: MT4

QT Funded PROS

+Minimum challenge cost of $12 is drastically below the industry average of $186.7.
+Days to first payout of 1 day is far faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
+Fee refund is available, reducing the financial risk of the challenge.
+Profit target of 7% is below the industry average of 8%, making the target easier to hit.

QT Funded CONS

−Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%.
−Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, indicating higher risk tolerance required.
−News trading is not allowed, restricting a commonly used trading strategy.

BuoyTrade PROS

+Min challenge cost of $50 is well below the industry average of $186.7, making entry highly affordable.
+Single-step funding is better than the industry average of 1.6 steps, offering a faster path to funded status.
+Max funding of $1,024,000 is above the industry average of $839,272.7, providing above-average scaling potential.
+Profit target of 5% is well below the industry average of 7.9%, making the evaluation stage easier to pass.

BuoyTrade CONS

−Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%, reducing the trader's share of earnings.
−Overall drawdown of 5% is well below the industry average of 7.9%, offering significantly less margin before breach.
−EA/automated trading is not allowed, restricting algorithmic traders from participating with this firm.

PROPDNA VERDICT

QT Funded

Higher trust score (72/100). Faster payouts at 1d. 80% profit split.

START WITH QT